From: Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] setsockopt locking fix
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:48:21 -0400
> On Jul 27, 2005, at 16:16:02, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Fix is correct, good thing it only hits Sparc :-)
> >
> > But your patch does not
On Jul 27, 2005, at 16:16:02, David S. Miller wrote:
Fix is correct, good thing it only hits Sparc :-)
But your patch does not apply cleanly (perhaps your
email client mangled it somehow) and I need to have
a "Signed-off-by: " line in order to apply the
patch.
Fixed. Attached is below. Patch
From: Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:47:30 -0400
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> # Node ID 77475acbe89242e63e6fd73dc66fe52643011ed7
> # Parent 43cd2abd0f4c5d2e8ee4666d6bf1f0b96e252e54
> Fix a bug where sock_reset_flag() was called wit
# HG changeset patch
# User Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Node ID 77475acbe89242e63e6fd73dc66fe52643011ed7
# Parent 43cd2abd0f4c5d2e8ee4666d6bf1f0b96e252e54
Fix a bug where sock_reset_flag() was called without lock_sock()
diff -r 43cd2abd0f4c -r 77475acbe892 net/core/sock.c
--- a/net/core/so
