On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 16:33, Kalle Valo wrote:
> ...
> Forgot to mention that I can remove the Fixes tags during commit, so no
> need to resend just because of those.
Cool, thanks.
> > I can definitely see how you can reasonably disagree, but I would not
> > be comfortable having code that only
Emil Renner Berthing writes:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 16:20, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> Willem de Bruijn writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:23 AM Emil Renner Berthing
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In commit d3ccc14dfe95 most of the tasklets in this driver was
>> >> updated to the new API. Howev
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 16:20, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Willem de Bruijn writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:23 AM Emil Renner Berthing
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> In commit d3ccc14dfe95 most of the tasklets in this driver was
> >> updated to the new API. However for the rx_work_tasklet only the
> >>
Willem de Bruijn writes:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:23 AM Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
>>
>> In commit d3ccc14dfe95 most of the tasklets in this driver was
>> updated to the new API. However for the rx_work_tasklet only the
>> type of the callback was changed from
>> void _rtl_rx_work(unsigned
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:23 AM Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
>
> In commit d3ccc14dfe95 most of the tasklets in this driver was
> updated to the new API. However for the rx_work_tasklet only the
> type of the callback was changed from
> void _rtl_rx_work(unsigned long data)
> to
> void _rtl_rx_
In commit d3ccc14dfe95 most of the tasklets in this driver was
updated to the new API. However for the rx_work_tasklet only the
type of the callback was changed from
void _rtl_rx_work(unsigned long data)
to
void _rtl_rx_work(struct tasklet_struct *t).
The initialization of rx_work_tasklet was
