Hi ByeoungWook,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:52 AM, ByeoungWook Kim wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> 0xfe and 0xfb was not same codes.
> 0xfe is udelay(50). and 0xfb is mdelay(50).
> It same code like udelay((n) * 1000).
I'm clearly blind! Sorry about that!
> but i agree with your answers of some parts. I
Hi Byeoungwook,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Byeoungwook Kim wrote:
> rtl_*_delay() functions were reused same codes about addr variable.
> So i have converted to rtl_addr_delay() from code about addr variable.
>
> Conditional codes in rtl_addr_delay() were improved in readability and
> perfor
rtl_*_delay() functions were reused same codes about addr variable.
So i have converted to rtl_addr_delay() from code about addr variable.
Conditional codes in rtl_addr_delay() were improved in readability and
performance by using switch codes.
Signed-off-by: Byeoungwook Kim
---
drivers/net/wir
