From: Johannes Berg
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 09:15:15 +0100
> On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 15:37 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> From: Johannes Berg
>>
>> When an rhashtabl walk is done from irq/bh context, we rightfully
>> get a lockdep complaint saying that we could get a (soft-)IRQ in
>> the middle of
On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 15:37 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg
>
> When an rhashtabl walk is done from irq/bh context, we rightfully
> get a lockdep complaint saying that we could get a (soft-)IRQ in
> the middle of a rehash. This happened e.g. in mac80211 as it does
> a walk in so
From: Johannes Berg
When an rhashtabl walk is done from irq/bh context, we rightfully
get a lockdep complaint saying that we could get a (soft-)IRQ in
the middle of a rehash. This happened e.g. in mac80211 as it does
a walk in soft-irq context.
Fix this by using irq-safe locking here. We don't n
