From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:03:05 +0200
> This explains why is the net usage of __ptr_ring_peek
> actually ok without locks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Applied, thanks Michael.
On 01/10/2018 06:03 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> This explains why is the net usage of __ptr_ring_peek
> actually ok without locks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
>
> John - I think this is more or less what you meant. Is that right?
Yep, thanks for following up.
Acked-by: John
This explains why is the net usage of __ptr_ring_peek
actually ok without locks.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
John - I think this is more or less what you meant. Is that right?
include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 14 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a
