On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:07:30PM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> calling function is a print information only function that returns void.
That is fine.
> I do think not adding error handling is worth it.
>
> I could change the return and then the calls if if you like.
How about printing the version s
On 10/12/20 3:01 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 01:09:55PM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Tom Rix
>>
>> Clang static analysis reports this representative problem
>>
>> ptp_clockmatrix.c:1852:2: warning: 5th function call argument
>> is an uninitialized value
>>
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 01:09:55PM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix
>
> Clang static analysis reports this representative problem
>
> ptp_clockmatrix.c:1852:2: warning: 5th function call argument
> is an uninitialized value
> snprintf(idtcm->version, sizeof(idtcm->version)
From: Tom Rix
Clang static analysis reports this representative problem
ptp_clockmatrix.c:1852:2: warning: 5th function call argument
is an uninitialized value
snprintf(idtcm->version, sizeof(idtcm->version), "%u.%u.%u",
^
