On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 6:39:10 PM CEST Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:28:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > gpio_to_irq does not return NO_IRQ but instead returns a negative
> > error code on failure. Returning NO_IRQ from the function has no
> > negative effects as we
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:28:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gpio_to_irq does not return NO_IRQ but instead returns a negative
> error code on failure. Returning NO_IRQ from the function has no
> negative effects as we only compare the result to the expected
> interrupt number, but it's better
gpio_to_irq does not return NO_IRQ but instead returns a negative
error code on failure. Returning NO_IRQ from the function has no
negative effects as we only compare the result to the expected
interrupt number, but it's better to return a proper failure
code for consistency, and we should remove N
