Re: [PATCH] net-ethtool: ETHTOOL_GUFO did not and should not require CAP_NET_ADMIN

2018-09-22 Thread David Miller
From: "Maciej Żenczykowski" Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 01:34:01 -0700 > From: Maciej Żenczykowski > > So it should not fail with EPERM even though it is no longer implemented... > > This is a fix for: > (userns)$ egrep ^Cap /proc/self/status > CapInh: 003f > CapPrm: 003ff

[PATCH] net-ethtool: ETHTOOL_GUFO did not and should not require CAP_NET_ADMIN

2018-09-22 Thread Maciej Żenczykowski
From: Maciej Żenczykowski So it should not fail with EPERM even though it is no longer implemented... This is a fix for: (userns)$ egrep ^Cap /proc/self/status CapInh: 003f CapPrm: 003f CapEff: 003f CapBnd: 003f CapAmb: 003f