On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 04:00:27PM +0100, Volodymyr Bendiuga wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> thanks for you comments and time taken to review. I will make a new
>
> version which will indicate net-next tree.
>
> About mv88e6xxx_remove(), this function will not be called
Correct, which is why i said:
>
Hi Andrew,
thanks for you comments and time taken to review. I will make a new
version which will indicate net-next tree.
About mv88e6xxx_remove(), this function will not be called
if switch has not been registered completely, therefore dispose will not
be called.
irq_dispose_mapping() is a
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:05:43AM +0100, Volodymyr Bendiuga wrote:
> If this is not done, then it is not possible to map
> irq next time, after EPROBE_DEFER.
>
> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Bendiuga
Hi Volodymyr
Thanks for your patches.
Please could you include in the subject line which tree it
