On 04/08/2016 01:15 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Daney
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:41:35 -0700
Due to mail server malfunction, this patch was sent twice. Please
ignore this duplicate.
This submission had another problem too.
Do not use the date of your commit as the date that gets put
From: David Daney
commit b7d3e3d3d21a ("net: thunderx: Don't leak phy device references
on -EPROBE_DEFER condition.") incorrectly moved the call to
of_node_put() outside of the loop. Under normal loop exit, the node
has already had of_node_put() called, so the extra call results in:
[8.2280
From: David Daney
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:41:35 -0700
> Due to mail server malfunction, this patch was sent twice. Please
> ignore this duplicate.
This submission had another problem too.
Do not use the date of your commit as the date that gets put into
your email headers.
This makes all of
Due to mail server malfunction, this patch was sent twice. Please
ignore this duplicate.
Thanks,
David Daney
On 03/31/2016 06:01 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
commit b7d3e3d3d21a ("net: thunderx: Don't leak phy device references
on -EPROBE_DEFER condition.") incorrectly moved th
From: David Daney
commit b7d3e3d3d21a ("net: thunderx: Don't leak phy device references
on -EPROBE_DEFER condition.") incorrectly moved the call to
of_node_put() outside of the loop. Under normal loop exit, the node
has already had of_node_put() called, so the extra call results in:
[8.2280
From: David Daney
commit b7d3e3d3d21a ("net: thunderx: Don't leak phy device references
on -EPROBE_DEFER condition.") incorrectly moved the call to
of_node_put() outside of the loop. Under normal loop exit, the node
has already had of_node_put() called, so the extra call results in:
[8.2280
