Hi Jingju,
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:43:08 +0800 wrote:
> The mvneta itself does not support WOL, but the PHY might.
> So pass the calls to the PHY
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingju Hou
> ---
> Since v1:
> - using phy_dev member in struct net_device
I noticed that you send a new v2 patch. So this patch s
The mvneta itself does not support WOL, but the PHY might.
So pass the calls to the PHY
Signed-off-by: Jingju Hou
---
Since v1:
- using phy_dev member in struct net_device
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 21 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ne
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 06:06:30PM +0800, Jingju Hou wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jingju Hou
Hi Jingju
Please include a real comment here. Something like:
The mvneta itself does not support WOL, but the PHY might. So pass the
calls to the PHY.
It also looks like you are patching an old kernel. Netw
Hi Jingju,
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc4 next-20170120]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jingju-Hou/net-mvneta-implement-set_wol-an
Hi Jingju,
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc4 next-20170120]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jingju-Hou/net-mvneta-implement-set_wol-an
Signed-off-by: Jingju Hou
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index e05e227..b684f43 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta
