On 02/04/2016 11:42 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Your patch summary prefixes are too verbose, it was enough to say only
"dm9000: ".
Or "davicom: dm9000: ". Missing the driver name itself doesn't look very
consistent. :-)
Well, I don't agree here. The subsystem should be fully specified
Sergei Shtylyov writes:
> Hello.
>
>Your patch summary prefixes are too verbose, it was enough to say only
> "dm9000: ".
Well, I don't agree here. The subsystem should be fully specified, at least this
is something I require in pxa, something that is also required in sound/*, etc
... If David
Hello.
Your patch summary prefixes are too verbose, it was enough to say only
"dm9000: ".
On 02/04/2016 12:40 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
The dm9000 driver doesn't work in at least one device-tree
configuration, spitting an error message on irq resource :
[1.062495] dm9000 800.ether
The dm9000 driver doesn't work in at least one device-tree
configuration, spitting an error message on irq resource :
[1.062495] dm9000 800.ethernet: insufficient resources
[1.068439] dm9000 800.ethernet: not found (-2).
[1.073451] dm9000: probe of 800.ethernet failed with e
