> Looking into the context (atomic!) and error message itself I would rather
> drop
> message completely.
How do you think about to take another look at a previous update suggestion
like the following?
net/atm: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in five
functions
https://pat
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:01:42AM +0800, Yi Wang wrote:
> From: Liao Pingfang
>
> Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc in the error message according to
> the previous kzalloc() call.
Looking into the context (atomic!) and error message itself I would rather drop
message completely.
> Signed-off-by:
From: Liao Pingfang
Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc in the error message according to
the previous kzalloc() call.
Signed-off-by: Liao Pingfang
---
net/atm/lec.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/atm/lec.c b/net/atm/lec.c
index ca37f5a..33033d7 100644
--- a
