On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 22:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
"David Miller" wrote:
> From: Ivan Mikhaylov
> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:07:52 +0400
>
> > Ben proposed one, is it eligible?
> > Need I resubmit patch with sign and detailed description?
>
> If I genuinely need to answer that question, maybe you should
From: Ivan Mikhaylov
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:07:52 +0400
> Ben proposed one, is it eligible?
> Need I resubmit patch with sign and detailed description?
If I genuinely need to answer that question, maybe you should sit back
for a little while and think about it yourself, ok?
--
To unsubscribe
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
"David Miller" wrote:
> From: Ivan Mikhaylov
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:42:22 +0400
>
> > Register dump out work preventing with
> > old ethtool + new driver and new ethtool + old driver.
>
> First of all you didn't provide a proper Signoff.
>
> Seco
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 11:05 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ivan Mikhaylov
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:42:22 +0400
>
> > Register dump out work preventing with
> > old ethtool + new driver and new ethtool + old driver.
>
> First of all you didn't provide a proper Signoff.
>
> Second of all,
From: Ivan Mikhaylov
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:42:22 +0400
> Register dump out work preventing with
> old ethtool + new driver and new ethtool + old driver.
First of all you didn't provide a proper Signoff.
Second of all, there was so much discussion about whether this does
or does not break t
Register dump out work preventing with
old ethtool + new driver and new ethtool + old driver.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/core.h |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/core.h
b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/core.h
index 2
