On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 4:56 PM Dominique Martinet
wrote:
>
> Alexander Kapshuk wrote on Sun, Jun 21, 2020:
> > Fix rcu not being dereferenced cleanly by using the task
> > helpers (un)lock_task_sighand instead of spin_lock_irqsave and
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore to ensure current->sighand is a val
Alexander Kapshuk wrote on Sun, Jun 21, 2020:
> Fix rcu not being dereferenced cleanly by using the task
> helpers (un)lock_task_sighand instead of spin_lock_irqsave and
> spin_unlock_irqrestore to ensure current->sighand is a valid pointer as
> suggested in the email referenced below.
Ack.
I'll t
Fix rcu not being dereferenced cleanly by using the task
helpers (un)lock_task_sighand instead of spin_lock_irqsave and
spin_unlock_irqrestore to ensure current->sighand is a valid pointer as
suggested in the email referenced below.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kapshuk
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/l
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 1:57 PM Dominique Martinet
wrote:
>
> Alexander Kapshuk wrote on Sun, Jun 21, 2020:
> > Thanks for your feedback.
> > Shall I simply resend the v2 patch with the commit message reworded as
> > you suggested, or should I make it a v3 patch instead?
>
> Yes please resend the
Alexander Kapshuk wrote on Sun, Jun 21, 2020:
> Thanks for your feedback.
> Shall I simply resend the v2 patch with the commit message reworded as
> you suggested, or should I make it a v3 patch instead?
Yes please resend the same commit reworded. v2 or v3 doesn't matter
much, the [PATCH whatever]
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 11:45 AM Dominique Martinet
wrote:
>
> Alexander Kapshuk wrote on Sat, Jun 20, 2020:
> > Use (un)lock_task_sighand instead of spin_lock_irqsave and
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore to ensure current->sighand is a valid pointer as
> > suggested in the email referenced below.
>
> T
Alexander Kapshuk wrote on Sat, Jun 20, 2020:
> Use (un)lock_task_sighand instead of spin_lock_irqsave and
> spin_unlock_irqrestore to ensure current->sighand is a valid pointer as
> suggested in the email referenced below.
Thanks for v2! Patch itself looks good to me.
I always add another `Link:
Use (un)lock_task_sighand instead of spin_lock_irqsave and
spin_unlock_irqrestore to ensure current->sighand is a valid pointer as
suggested in the email referenced below.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kapshuk
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200618190807.GA20699@nautica/
---
net/9p/client.c | 18