From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:58:20 -0800
> The problem I was seeing turned out to be that skb->dev is NULL when
> the checksum is being completed in user context. This happens because the
> reference to the device is dropped (to allow it to be released when
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:02:10 -0800 (PST)
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 09:59:31 +1100
>
> > Sorry but I disagree. First of all this is inside a net_ratelimit() so
> > DoS potentials are well, limited :)
> >
> > More
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 09:59:31 +1100
> Sorry but I disagree. First of all this is inside a net_ratelimit() so
> DoS potentials are well, limited :)
>
> More importantly, you should never see this unless there is a hardware
> fault or a serious software bug.
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The netdev_rx_csum_fault function shouldn't show the stack. The backtrace
> can cause way more output than necessary, and could be a potential DoS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry but I disagree. First of all this is i
