On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 9:11 AM Ian Rogers wrote:
>
> If bits is 0, the case when the map is empty, then the >> is the size of
> the register which is undefined behavior - on x86 it is the same as a
> shift by 0. Fix by handling the 0 case explicitly when running with
> address sanitizer.
>
> A va
> On Oct 29, 2020, at 9:09 AM, Ian Rogers wrote:
>
> If bits is 0, the case when the map is empty, then the >> is the size of
> the register which is undefined behavior - on x86 it is the same as a
> shift by 0. Fix by handling the 0 case explicitly when running with
> address sanitizer.
>
>
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ian Rogers wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:12 AM Andrii Nakryiko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:40 PM Ian Rogers wrote:
> > >
> > > If bits is 0, the case when the map is empty, then the >> is the size of
> > > the register which is undefined beha
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:40 PM Ian Rogers wrote:
>
> If bits is 0, the case when the map is empty, then the >> is the size of
> the register which is undefined behavior - on x86 it is the same as a
> shift by 0. Fix by handling the 0 case explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers
> ---
No need.
