From: Maciej Żenczykowski
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:57:58 -0700
> From: Maciej Żenczykowski
>
> This implements:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7559
>
> Backoff is performed according to RFC3315 section 14:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3315#section-14
>
> We allow setting /proc/sys/
Passes my local unittest for this behaviour.
Acked-by: Erik Kline
I'm not sure what line you're referring to.
There are *no* outright jiffies or msecs in this patch, with the
exception of the (3600*HZ) line which is already obvious enough.
The 90 21 190 100 constants are not jiffies nor
miliseconds, they're simply numbers, such that 90/1
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016, at 08:57, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> From: Maciej Żenczykowski
>
> This implements:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7559
>
> Backoff is performed according to RFC3315 section 14:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3315#section-14
>
> We allow setting /proc/sys
From: Maciej Żenczykowski
This implements:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7559
Backoff is performed according to RFC3315 section 14:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3315#section-14
We allow setting /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/*/router_solicitations
to a negative value meaning an unlimited number
Please do not do this.
When you need to repsin a patch in a patch series to fix
or otherwise resolve something, you must make a fresh
resubmission of the entire patch series.
You also must properly mark the resubmission with a
proper indication that this is a new version of the
patch series by s
From: Maciej Żenczykowski
This implements:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7559
Backoff is performed according to RFC3315 section 14:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3315#section-14
Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski
---
include/net/if_inet6.h | 1 +
net/ipv6/addrconf.c| 31 +++
