On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 10:24:27PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> I thought that when someone _BROKE_ an interface with this kind of change,
> it was their duty to fix _ALL_ parts of the system that uses this facility.
> At a minimum, shouldn't all maintainers get a heads up? I don't subscribe
>
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:35:36 +0100
Ulrich Kunitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem is that you there are now different work structures:
struct work_struct and struct delayed_work. The quick fix seems to
have been to change all old work_structs as associnfo's work to
de
