From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:31:39 -0700
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:57:00 -0700
> Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 18:54 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:49:34 -0700
> > > Arjan van de V
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:57:00 -0700
Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 18:54 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:49:34 -0700
> > Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:50 -0700, Stephen Hemmin
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 18:54 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:49:34 -0700
> Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:50 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > Tne network code does memset for 6 and 8 byte values, that can easily
> > > b
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:49:34 -0700
Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:50 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Tne network code does memset for 6 and 8 byte values, that can easily
> > be optimized into simple assignments without string instructions.
>
>
> so
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:50 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Tne network code does memset for 6 and 8 byte values, that can easily
> be optimized into simple assignments without string instructions.
so... question.
Why are we doing this by hand? Wouldn't gcc just generate this code in
the first
Tne network code does memset for 6 and 8 byte values, that can easily
be optimized into simple assignments without string instructions.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/include/asm-i386/string.h 2007-08-17 15:14:37.0 -0700
+++ b/include/asm-i386/string.h 2007-08