Scott Wood wrote:
The hardware must not see that is given ownership of a buffer until it is
completely written, and when the driver receives ownership of a buffer,
it must ensure that any other reads to the buffer reflect its final
state. Thus, I/O barriers are added where required.
Without thi
The hardware must not see that is given ownership of a buffer until it is
completely written, and when the driver receives ownership of a buffer,
it must ensure that any other reads to the buffer reflect its final
state. Thus, I/O barriers are added where required.
Without this patch, I have obse
AFAICS you need stronger barriers though; {w,r,}mb(),
to prevent _any_ reordering of those memory accesses,
not just the compiler-generated ones.
My impression was that the eieio used by iobarrier would be sufficient
for that, as we're not trying to synchronize between accesses to
different ty
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
The hardware must not see that is given ownership of a buffer until it is
completely written, and when the driver receives ownership of a buffer,
it must ensure that any other reads to the buffer reflect its final
state. Thus, I/O barriers are added where required.
Wit
The hardware must not see that is given ownership of a buffer until it
is
completely written, and when the driver receives ownership of a buffer,
it must ensure that any other reads to the buffer reflect its final
state. Thus, I/O barriers are added where required.
Without this patch, I have ob
The hardware must not see that is given ownership of a buffer until it is
completely written, and when the driver receives ownership of a buffer,
it must ensure that any other reads to the buffer reflect its final
state. Thus, I/O barriers are added where required.
Without this patch, I have obse
