On 28 March 2018 at 23:53, NeilBrown wrote:
> Thank for this patch!
> The above looks a bit fragile to me.
> gfs2_glock_iter_next() (And hence gfs2_glock_seq_start()) will sometimes
> exit with gl_held true, and sometimes with it false.
> gfs2_glock_seq_stop() assumes that it is false.
> Normally
On Wed, Mar 28 2018, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Function rhashtable_walk_peek is problematic because there is no
> guarantee that the glock previously returned still exists; when that key
> is deleted, rhashtable_walk_peek can end up returning a different key,
> which would cause an inconsistent
Function rhashtable_walk_peek is problematic because there is no
guarantee that the glock previously returned still exists; when that key
is deleted, rhashtable_walk_peek can end up returning a different key,
which would cause an inconsistent glock dump. So instead of using
rhashtable_walk_peek, k
