Re: [PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT

2007-11-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Auke Kok wrote: From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 1baseT as SUPPORTED_1baseT_Full. The code seems to be half implemented because the "advertising" field has the implementation. this patch just adds it for supported reporting.

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT

2007-11-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
Kok, Auke wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Auke Kok wrote: > >> From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 1baseT > >> as SUPPORTED_1baseT_Full. The code seems to be half > >> implemented because the "advertising" field has the i

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT

2007-11-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Ben Hutchings wrote: > Auke Kok wrote: >> From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 1baseT >> as SUPPORTED_1baseT_Full. The code seems to be half >> implemented because the "advertising" field has the implementation. > > I reported

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT

2007-11-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
Auke Kok wrote: > From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 1baseT > as SUPPORTED_1baseT_Full. The code seems to be half > implemented because the "advertising" field has the implementation. I reported this lack on Sourceforge a whil

[PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT

2007-11-07 Thread Auke Kok
From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 1baseT as SUPPORTED_1baseT_Full. The code seems to be half implemented because the "advertising" field has the implementation. this patch just adds it for supported reporting. Signed-off-by: Jes