Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-18 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 13:48 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the > common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type > references in the tree. > > A meta-schema update to catch these is pending. > > Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-17 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Rob > Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the > common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type > references in the tree. > > A meta-schema update to catch these is pending. > > Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > Cc: Maxime Ripard > Cc: Linus Walleij >

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-17 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:48:58PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the > common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type > references in the tree. > > A meta-schema update to catch these is pending. > > Cc: Nicolas Saenz Ju

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-17 Thread Srinivas Kandagatla
On 16/03/2021 19:48, Rob Herring wrote: Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type references in the tree. A meta-schema update to catch these is pending. Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Cc: Maxime Ripard Cc: L

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-17 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 16.03.2021 13:48:58, Rob Herring wrote: > Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the > common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type > references in the tree. > > A meta-schema update to catch these is pending. > > Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > Cc: Maxi

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-16 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:48:58PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the > common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type > references in the tree. > > A meta-schema update to catch these is pending. > > Cc: Nicolas Saenz Ju

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-16 Thread Suman Anna
On 3/16/21 2:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the > common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type > references in the tree. > > A meta-schema update to catch these is pending. > > Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > Cc: Maxime R

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-16 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:48:58PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the > common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type > references in the tree. Acked-by: Mark Brown signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-16 Thread Alex Elder
On 3/16/21 2:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote: Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type references in the tree. A meta-schema update to catch these is pending. For net/qcom,ipa.yaml: Acked-by: Alex Elder Cc:

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-16 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 22:49, Rob Herring wrote: > > Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the > common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type > references in the tree. > > A meta-schema update to catch these is pending. > > Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > C

[PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

2021-03-16 Thread Rob Herring
Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type references in the tree. A meta-schema update to catch these is pending. Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Cc: Maxime Ripard Cc: Linus Walleij Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: