On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 07:39:16 +0100
Markus Brunner wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2015 13:04:46 David Rivshin wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 16:44:19 +0100
> ...
> > > Your patch works fine on my board, which uses MII and dual_emac
> > > with a fixed_phy and a real one.
> >
> > Thanks for checkin
On Monday 14 December 2015 13:04:46 David Rivshin wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 16:44:19 +0100
...
> > Your patch works fine on my board, which uses MII and dual_emac with
> > a fixed_phy and a real one.
>
> Thanks for checking. The only dual_emac board I have available is the
> EVMSK, which has tw
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 16:44:19 +0100
Markus Brunner wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 December 2015 22:31:15 David Rivshin wrote:
> ...
> > This patch was originally developed in parallel with 1f71e8c96fc6 to
> > accomplish the same goal. When I replaced this patch with
> > 1f71e8c96fc6, I found that it did
On Wednesday 09 December 2015 22:31:15 David Rivshin wrote:
...
> This patch was originally developed in parallel with 1f71e8c96fc6 to
> accomplish the same goal. When I replaced this patch with 1f71e8c96fc6,
> I found that it did not work on my hardware (which uses RGMII), so I
> am submitting thi
Commit 1f71e8c96fc654724723ce987e0a8b2aeb81746d ("drivers: net: cpsw: Add
support for fixed-link PHY") used a 'goto no_phy_slave' to skip over the
processing of the mutually-exclusive "phy_id" property. Unfortunately that
also skipped the "phy-mode" property processing, leaving slave_data->phy_if
w
