Re: [PATCH] compat. ifconf: fix limits

2006-03-08 Thread David S. Miller
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:41:16 -0800 > On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:46:27 -0800 (PST) David S. Miller wrote: > > > Is this one relevant for -stable? > > Yes, IMO. Have to wait for it to be merged upstream, right? I'll take care of everything, thanks Randy. -

Re: [PATCH] compat. ifconf: fix limits

2006-03-08 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:46:27 -0800 (PST) David S. Miller wrote: > From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:16:08 -0800 > > > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > A recent change to compat. dev_ifconf() in fs/compat_ioctl.c > > causes ifconf data to be truncat

Re: [PATCH] compat. ifconf: fix limits

2006-03-08 Thread David S. Miller
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:16:08 -0800 > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > A recent change to compat. dev_ifconf() in fs/compat_ioctl.c > causes ifconf data to be truncated 1 entry too early when copying it > to userspace. The correct amount of dat