Oops, thanks for noticing the issue with strlen in the for loop. Changing to
"int len = strlen(buff); for (i = 0; i < len; i++) <..>" should fix the issue.
I'm going to re-submit the patch.
Also, I put some testing results:
https://gist.github.com/brb/5369b5cfd08babb80cf2c4081dc19762
On Thu, J
[ My reply somehow rejected by netdev, this is to send it again. ]
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:19 AM Martynas Pumputis wrote:
>
> Previously, bpf_num_possible_cpus() had a bug when calculating a
> number of possible CPUs in the case of sparse CPU allocations, as
> it was considering only the first
Previously, bpf_num_possible_cpus() had a bug when calculating a
number of possible CPUs in the case of sparse CPU allocations, as
it was considering only the first range or element of
/sys/devices/system/cpu/possible.
E.g. in the case of "0,2-3" (CPU 1 is not available), the function
returned 1 i
