On Wednesday 23 August 2006 18:55, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> >> Please note that this test is only compile tested, as
> >> I don't have a b44 device.
>
> >> @@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@
> >>u16 *ptr = (u16 *) data;
> >>
> >>for (i = 0; i < 128; i += 2)
> >> - ptr[i /
Michael Buesch wrote:
Please note that this test is only compile tested, as
I don't have a b44 device.
@@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@
u16 *ptr = (u16 *) data;
for (i = 0; i < 128; i += 2)
- ptr[i / 2] = readw(bp->regs + 4096 + i);
+ ptr[i / 2] = cpu_to_le16(read
Oh, I think I should have CCed Jeff ;)
Sorry.
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 12:32, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Please apply this patch to -mm for testing.
> I think in the long term we want to convert b44 to use the
> new ssb backend driver, which would also fix the issue, but
> for now
Hi Andrew,
Please apply this patch to -mm for testing.
I think in the long term we want to convert b44 to use the
new ssb backend driver, which would also fix the issue, but
for now I think this small fix is best.
Please note that this test is only compile tested, as
I don't have a b44 device.
-
