On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:03:07 -0800 Tom Rix wrote:
> On 12/17/20 9:28 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:17:24 -0800 Tom Rix wrote:
> >> On 12/16/20 4:45 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 t...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix
>
>
On 12/17/20 9:28 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:17:24 -0800 Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 12/16/20 4:45 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 t...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Tom Rix
See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst.
h should n
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:17:24 -0800 Tom Rix wrote:
> On 12/16/20 4:45 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 t...@redhat.com wrote:
> >> From: Tom Rix
> >>
> >> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst.
> >> h should no longer be used in the format specifier for pri
On 12/16/20 4:45 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 t...@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Tom Rix
>>
>> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst.
>> h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix
> That's for new code I ass
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 t...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix
>
> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst.
> h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix
That's for new code I assume?
What's the harm in leaving this ancient code b
From: Tom Rix
See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst.
h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix
---
drivers/atm/ambassador.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/atm/ambassador.c b/drivers/atm/ambassa
