On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:26:31PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:09:22AM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > David Miller found a problem in a wireless driver where I was using
> > compare_ether_addr() on potentially unaligned data. Document that
> > compare_ether_addr() is not s
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:09:22AM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
> David Miller found a problem in a wireless driver where I was using
> compare_ether_addr() on potentially unaligned data. Document that
> compare_ether_addr() is not safe for use everywhere, and add an equivalent
> function that works
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:09:22 + (GMT)
Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Miller found a problem in a wireless driver where I was using
> compare_ether_addr() on potentially unaligned data. Document that
> compare_ether_addr() is not safe for use everywhere, and add an equivalent
>
David Miller found a problem in a wireless driver where I was using
compare_ether_addr() on potentially unaligned data. Document that
compare_ether_addr() is not safe for use everywhere, and add an equivalent
function that works regardless of alignment.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTE
