Re: [PATCH] XFRM: Display the audited SPI value in host byte order

2007-12-12 Thread Steve Grubb
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 14:05:42 Paul Moore wrote: > This patch corrects this inconsistency by writing the SPI values to the > audit record in host byte order. Looks OK, to me, too. -Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMA

Re: [PATCH] XFRM: Display the audited SPI value in host byte order

2007-12-12 Thread David Miller
From: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:05:42 -0500 > Currently the IPsec protocol SPI values are written to the audit log in > network byte order which is different from almost all other values which > are recorded in host byte order. This patch corrects this inconsistency

[PATCH] XFRM: Display the audited SPI value in host byte order

2007-12-12 Thread Paul Moore
Currently the IPsec protocol SPI values are written to the audit log in network byte order which is different from almost all other values which are recorded in host byte order. This patch corrects this inconsistency by writing the SPI values to the audit record in host byte order. Signed-off-by: