Hi,
Sorry for late response, I was trying to find some h/w so as
to retest this before responding. (Which I wasn't able to
find, and so haven't retested yet).
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 05:23:07AM +0100, Andi Kleen was heard to remark:
>
> >
> > +#ifdef XXX_CONFIG_IXGB_EEH_RECOVERY
> > + if(u
>
> +#ifdef XXX_CONFIG_IXGB_EEH_RECOVERY
> + if(unlikely(icr==EEH_IO_ERROR_VALUE(4))) {
> + if (eeh_slot_is_isolated (adapter->pdev))
> + // disable_irq_nosync (adapter->pdev->irq);
> + return IRQ_NONE; /* Not our interrupt */
So does the return bel
gt; >
> > > >
- Forwarded message from Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: [PATCH] PCI Error Recovery: ixgb network device driver
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: gregkh_patchbomb
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:38:34 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 1/6/06, linas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here's the corresponding patch for the ixgb.
>
> --linas
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following patch to the e100 device driver is in the current
> > 2.6.15-mm1 tree, and is being pushed to the mainline 2.6.15 tree.
> >
> > I wrote this patch, and I believe
version of this patch has been shipping as
> a part of SUSE SLES9 for about a year, and so has been
> tested in the field.
>
> Similar patches to follow for the e1000 and the ixgb.
>
> --linas
>
- Forwarded message from Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Sub
