Re: [PATCH] NET : secure sequence number functions can use nsec resolution instead of usec

2007-03-28 Thread David Miller
From: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:31:56 -0400 (EDT) > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > Hello David > > > > We could use the nanosec resolution for various functions defined in > > drivers/char/random.c > > (secure_tcpv6_sequence_number(), secure_tcp_

Re: [PATCH] NET : secure sequence number functions can use nsec resolution instead of usec

2007-03-28 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 05:43:22PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Hello David > > We could use the nanosec resolution for various functions defined in > drivers/char/random.c > (secure_tcpv6_sequence_number(), secure_tcp_sequence_number(), > secure_dccp_sequence_number()) > > I am not sure if it'

Re: [PATCH] NET : secure sequence number functions can use nsec resolution instead of usec

2007-03-28 Thread James Morris
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Hello David > > We could use the nanosec resolution for various functions defined in > drivers/char/random.c > (secure_tcpv6_sequence_number(), secure_tcp_sequence_number(), > secure_dccp_sequence_number()) > > I am not sure if it's a netdev related p

[PATCH] NET : secure sequence number functions can use nsec resolution instead of usec

2007-03-28 Thread Eric Dumazet
Hello David We could use the nanosec resolution for various functions defined in drivers/char/random.c (secure_tcpv6_sequence_number(), secure_tcp_sequence_number(), secure_dccp_sequence_number()) I am not sure if it's a netdev related patch or core kernel, so I have CC Andrew. Thank you [PA