Kristian Slavov wrote:
Hi,
The following patch seems to get the work done. Patch is against 2.6.15.3.
Here's the signed-off tag I forgot to add, should that matter anymore.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BR,
--
Krisu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:59:31 -0800 (PST)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > Good spot. Please drop {}, otherwise, I agree. Thank you.
>
> I'll take care of fixing that when I put in the fix.
Okay, thanks.
Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROT
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 08:44:36 +0900 (JST)
> Hello.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:17:24 +0200), Kristian
> Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > During NETDEV_DOWN we clear IF_READY, and we don't set it back in
> > NETD
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:17:24 +0200), Kristian
Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> During NETDEV_DOWN we clear IF_READY, and we don't set it back in
> NETDEV_UP. While starting to perform DAD on the link-local address, we
> notice that the device is not in
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 05:17:24PM +0200, Kristian Slavov wrote:
> During NETDEV_DOWN we clear IF_READY, and we don't set it back in
> NETDEV_UP. While starting to perform DAD on the link-local address, we
> notice that the device is not in IF_READY, and we abort autoconfiguration
> process (whi
Hi,
If you set network interface down and up again, the IPv6 address
autoconfiguration does not work. 'ip addr' shows that the link-local
address is in tentative state. We don't even react to periodical router
advertisements.
During NETDEV_DOWN we clear IF_READY, and we don't set it back in
