Re: [PATCH] Ensure IF_READY is unset when link is not ready

2007-03-07 Thread Mitsuru Chinen
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:54:38 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:47:56 +1100 > > > Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On linux-2.6.21-rc2 or later, IPv6 link-local address is not assigned to > >

Re: [PATCH] Ensure IF_READY is unset when link is not ready

2007-03-07 Thread David Miller
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:47:56 +1100 > Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On linux-2.6.21-rc2 or later, IPv6 link-local address is not assigned to > > some kind of interfaces during system start-up. (I found this issue > > occures with e100, e1

Re: [PATCH] Ensure IF_READY is unset when link is not ready

2007-03-07 Thread Herbert Xu
Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On linux-2.6.21-rc2 or later, IPv6 link-local address is not assigned to > some kind of interfaces during system start-up. (I found this issue > occures with e100, e1000 and tg3.) Here is an alternative fix. [IPV6]: Do not set IF_READY if device is d

[PATCH] Ensure IF_READY is unset when link is not ready

2007-03-05 Thread Mitsuru Chinen
Hi there, On linux-2.6.21-rc2 or later, IPv6 link-local address is not assigned to some kind of interfaces during system start-up. (I found this issue occures with e100, e1000 and tg3.) This issue comes from the change that inet6_dev is allocated when NETDEV_REGISTER event occurs. The allocation