From: Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:33:12 +0300
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:07:11 +0300
> >
> >
> >>ANK says: "It is rarely used, that's wy it was not noticed.
> >>But in the places, where it is
Hello!
> What bug triggered that helped you discover this? Or is it
> merely from a code audit?
I asked the same question. :-)
openvz added some another fields to skbuff and when it was found
that they are lost while clone, he tried to figure out how all this works
and looked for another exampl
David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:07:11 +0300
>
>
>>ANK says: "It is rarely used, that's wy it was not noticed.
>>But in the places, where it is used, it should be disaster."
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
From: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:07:11 +0300
> ANK says: "It is rarely used, that's wy it was not noticed.
> But in the places, where it is used, it should be disaster."
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied.
What bug triggered that he
ANK says: "It is rarely used, that's wy it was not noticed.
But in the places, where it is used, it should be disaster."
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/core/skbuff.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -463,6 +4
