From: Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 11:07:15 +0400
> David Miller wrote:
> > I can only assume you wish to do something with the UDP hash table
> > sizes, and therefore only want to have a need to touch one function.
>
> You are right, I have told that this must help
David Miller wrote:
> From: Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 18:51:36 +0400
>
>> Make access to udphash/udplitehash symmetrical to inet hashes.
>>
>> This may also help network namespaces, since they tend to use
>> one hash for different namespaces by selecting the hash
From: Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 18:51:36 +0400
> Make access to udphash/udplitehash symmetrical to inet hashes.
>
> This may also help network namespaces, since they tend to use
> one hash for different namespaces by selecting the hash chain
> depending on a hash
Make access to udphash/udplitehash symmetrical to inet hashes.
This may also help network namespaces, since they tend to use
one hash for different namespaces by selecting the hash chain
depending on a hash value and the namespace.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --g
