At Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:05:45 -0700 (PDT),
David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:59:16 +0900
>
> > At Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:08:55 -0700 (PDT),
> > David Miller wrote:
> >
> > > 2) It is much better to add the appropriate CONFIG_SYSCTL
> > >
At Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:08:55 -0700 (PDT),
David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:38:55 +0900
>
> > It cannot build with CONFIG_SYSCTL=n and CONFIG_INET=y.
> > In case of CONFIG_INET=y it should become CONFIG_SYSCTL=y.
> >
> > Signed-off-by:
From: Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:59:16 +0900
> At Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:08:55 -0700 (PDT),
> David Miller wrote:
>
> > 2) It is much better to add the appropriate CONFIG_SYSCTL
> >ifdefs to the INET code than to force it on for everyone.
>
> It examined that,
From: Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:38:55 +0900
> It cannot build with CONFIG_SYSCTL=n and CONFIG_INET=y.
> In case of CONFIG_INET=y it should become CONFIG_SYSCTL=y.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1) Please post networking patches to netdev
