On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530
Varun Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an
> age entry for all the routes in the routing table. The entry in the RFC is
> inetCidrRouteAge and oid is inetCidrRouteAge.1.10.
> Many s
From: Varun Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:28:37 +0530
> Ok i understand. But can you suggest anyother way to do the above?
Just because I found a fault in your patch doesn't mean that
it becomes my job isn't to implement the feature for you.
-
To unsubscribe from this
David Miller wrote:
> From: Varun Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:51:39 +0530
>
>
>> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / wrote:
>>
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530), Varun
>>> Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>>>
>>>
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530), Varun
> Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
>
>> According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an
>> age entry for all the routes in the routing table. The entr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530), Varun
Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an
> age entry for all the routes in the routing table. The entry in the RFC is
> inetCidrRouteAge and oid
According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an age
entry for all the routes in the routing table. The entry in the RFC is
inetCidrRouteAge and oid is inetCidrRouteAge.1.10.
Many snmp application require this age entry. So iam adding the age field in
the routing table
