I thought the nature of trans_fd would have prevented any sort of true
zero copy, but I suppose one less is always welcome :)
-eric
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Dominique Martinet
wrote:
> Eric Van Hensbergen wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2015:
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Dominique Ma
Eric Van Hensbergen wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2015:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Dominique Martinet
> wrote:
> > To be honest, I think it might be better to just bail out if we get in
> > this switch (m->req->rc == NULL after p9_tag_lookup) and not try to
> > allocate more, because if we get ther
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Dominique Martinet
wrote:
> That code really should never be called (rc is allocated in
> tag_alloc), but if it had been it couldn't have worked...
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet
> ---
> net/9p/trans_fd.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> To be
That code really should never be called (rc is allocated in
tag_alloc), but if it had been it couldn't have worked...
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet
---
net/9p/trans_fd.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
To be honest, I think it might be better to just bail out if we get in
this swit
