In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:30:02 +0100),
Jean-Philippe Andriot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> The way to get the next protocol number of an IPv6 tunnel changes
> after introducing IP6CB, but I think we should go back to the
> previous version here.
:
> struct ipv6_
The way to get the next protocol number of an IPv6 tunnel changes
after introducing IP6CB, but I think we should go back to the
previous version here.
In our case I think there was a confusion between the pointer
on the first byte of the next header and the value of the next
header field.
Signed-
