In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 17 Jun 2007 23:17:49 -0700 (PDT)),
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > [PATCH 1/3] [IPV6]: Restore semantics of Routing Header processing.
> > [PATCH 2/3] [IPV6]: Do not send RH0 anymore.
> > [PATCH 3/3] [IPV6]: Make IPV6_{RECV,2292}RTHDR boolean opt
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:02:00 +0900 (JST)
> I think the IETF community is reaching consensus on deprecation of
> RH0 (Routing Header Type 0). RH0 is now handled as unknown RH type,
> e.g, accept it if segleft == 0, or send ICMPv6 Parameter Prob
Hello.
I think the IETF community is reaching consensus on deprecation of
RH0 (Routing Header Type 0). RH0 is now handled as unknown RH type,
e.g, accept it if segleft == 0, or send ICMPv6 Parameter Problem to
the sender.
[PATCH 1/3] [IPV6]: Restore semantics of Routing Header processing.
[PATCH
