In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,David Miller writes:
>Chas, as a subsystem maintainer, if you change a submitter's patch in
>a significant and non-trivial way, you should at least mention a brief
>reason why you did that. In this case, why did you delete all of
>Roland's __init/__devinit transforma
David> I was waiting for a resolution in the fact that the copy
David> Chas posted only had one of the transformations whereas as
David> you pointed out all of the ones in your original patch were
David> necessary.
Actually I think there was some confusion because akpm forwarded a
From: Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:17:54 -0700
> Dave, this was acked by Chas (and he even requested it go into 2.6.18)
> but it seems to have gotten dropped somewhere -- it's not in Linus's
> tree even after he pulled your net tree.
>
> Please apply.
Applied.
I w
he_init_one() is declared __devinit, but calls lots of init functions
that are marked __init. However, if CONFIG_HOTPLUG is enabled,
__devinit functions go into normal .text, which leads to
WARNING: drivers/atm/he.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from
.text between 'he_start' (
he_init_one() is declared __devinit, but calls lots of init functions
that are marked __init. However, if CONFIG_HOTPLUG is enabled,
__devinit functions go into normal .text, which leads to
WARNING: drivers/atm/he.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from
.text between 'he_start' (
