From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:46:56 -0300
> Oops, sorry I overlooked that, did a test without an the last one was with
> it defined, but I guess that leaving it as is for a few days wouldn't harm
> so that people get a bit of this debugging and perhap
Em Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:43:45PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo)
> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:19:59 -0300
>
> > Indeed, there were some issues about that thing, I think I have those
> > handled
> > properly now, please take a look at the comm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:19:59 -0300
> Indeed, there were some issues about that thing, I think I have those handled
> properly now, please take a look at the comments and tell me if you find any
> holes.
Looks good, I'll get to pulling this in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1122526171 -0300
committer Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1122526171 -0300
[PATCH][NET] Cleanup INET_REFCNT_DEBUG code
> On 7/22/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
