Quoting Miika Komu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Miika Komu wrote:
>
> > Ah, forgot to add new files to version control, sorry. My bad...
>
> The last patch I sent should be fine.
>
Yes, this patch taken from the mail works just fine.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Miika Komu wrote:
Ah, forgot to add new files to version control, sorry. My bad...
The last patch I sent should be fine.
--
Miika Komu http://www.iki.fi/miika/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the
This patch introduces the BEET mode (Bound End-to-End Tunnel) with as
specified by the ietf draft at the following link:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nikander-esp-beet-mode-06.txt
The patch provides only single family support (i.e. inner family =
outer family).
Signed-off-by: Diego
Ah, forgot to add new files to version control, sorry. My bad...
--
Miika Komu http://www.iki.fi/miika/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kerne
This patch introduces the BEET mode (Bound End-to-End Tunnel) with as
specified by the ietf draft at the following link:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nikander-esp-beet-mode-06.txt
The patch provides only single family support (i.e. inner family =
outer family).
Signed-off-by: Diego
Ok, I will resend the patch in a moment. I tested it with cg-* tools and
it did not create any conflicts with davem branch. The email programs with
automatic line wrapping are really tricky, seems like "mail" or "mailx"
really the only options.
--
Miika Komu
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Diego Beltrami wrote:
The patch which introduces the BEET mode and which previously was sent to this
mailing list is valid also for
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.19.git;a=summary
branch.
However there are probably some errors in attaching inlin
The patch which introduces the BEET mode and which previously was sent to this
mailing list is valid also for
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.19.git;a=summary
branch.
However there are probably some errors in attaching inline the patch to the
mail.
I retry to reattach
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:09:07AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.19.git;a=summary
Yes please use this one until 2.6.18 is released.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:52:26 +0300 Diego Beltrami wrote:
>
> > I suppose that this applies to Dave's netdev git tree?
> > That would explain why I get lots of patch errors when I try
> > to apply it to 2.6.18-rc7...
>
> Actually we made the patch against linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.19.git
>
>
> I suppose that this applies to Dave's netdev git tree?
> That would explain why I get lots of patch errors when I try
> to apply it to 2.6.18-rc7...
Actually we made the patch against linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.19.git
is that the wrong branch?
--
Diego
-
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:25:49 +0300 (EEST) Miika Komu wrote:
> Below is a fixed version of the announced patch. I hope this one is ok.
Yes, the split line is fixed now.
I suppose that this applies to Dave's netdev git tree?
That would explain why I get lots of patch errors when I try
to apply it
Below is a fixed version of the announced patch. I hope this one is ok.
Signed-off-by: Diego Beltrami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Miika Komu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Pathak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Ahren
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:26:19 +0300 Diego Beltrami wrote:
Looks like IMP (? or something else along the way?) split a long line
into 2 lines for you (same thing in 2 places). See below.
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_beet.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_beet.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000.
Hi all,
here you can find the patch rebased to the current tree net-2.6.19 which
introduces the BEET mode (Bound End-to-End Tunnel) as specified by the ietf
draft at the following link:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nikander-esp-beet-mode-06.txt
A BEET mode Security Associations reco
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:10:06 +0300), Diego
Beltrami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> as part of this email you can find a patch which introduces the BEET mode
> (Bound
> End-to-End Tunnel) as specified by the ietf draft at the following link:
:
> Signed-off-by
Hi,
as part of this email you can find a patch which introduces the BEET mode (Bound
End-to-End Tunnel) as specified by the ietf draft at the following link:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nikander-esp-beet-mode-06.txt
A BEET mode Security Associations records two pairs of IP addresse
17 matches
Mail list logo
