On 02/21/2016 10:16 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
[...]
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
This patch supports the following interrupts.
- One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
- One interrupt for emac
- Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network control
rx/tx)
This pat
On 02/21/2016 06:42 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
[...]
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
This patch supports the following interrupts.
- One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
- One interrupt for emac
- Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network control
rx/tx)
This pat
Hello.
Sorry for the late reply -- I was hoping to get AVB working on another
gen2 board...
On 02/08/2016 08:19 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
[...]
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
This patch supports the following interrupts.
- One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
- One inte
Hi Sergei-san,
2016-02-08 2:09 GMT+09:00 Sergei Shtylyov :
> Hello.
>
> On 02/07/2016 07:50 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
>
>> I apologize for not responding to you earlier.
>
>
>Absolutely no problem, these reviews/tests take time from my main tasks
> anyway. :-)
>
>
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
2016-01-29 2:51 GMT+09:00 Sergei Shtylyov :
> On 01/24/2016 06:52 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
>
>> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
>>
>> This patch supports the following interrupts.
>>
>> - One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
>
>
>Looking at the code again, ravb_multi_interrupot
On 02/07/2016 07:56 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
This patch supports the following interrupts.
- One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
- One interrupt for emac
- Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network control rx/tx)
This patch imp
Hello.
On 02/07/2016 07:50 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
I apologize for not responding to you earlier.
Absolutely no problem, these reviews/tests take time from my main tasks
anyway. :-)
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
This patch supports the following interrupts.
- One interrupt for multiple
Hi Sergei,
I apologize for not responding to you earlier.
2016-01-29 1:48 GMT+09:00 Sergei Shtylyov :
> Hello.
>
>
> On 01/24/2016 06:52 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
>
>> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
>>
>> This patch supports the following interrupts.
>>
>> - One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, err
2016-01-29 2:32 GMT+09:00 Sergei Shtylyov :
> On 01/24/2016 06:52 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
>
>> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
>>
>> This patch supports the following interrupts.
>>
>> - One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
>> - One interrupt for emac
>> - Four interrupts for dma
On 01/28/2016 06:50 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
Kaneko-san, with the amount of the review changes, it might make sense for
you to assume the authorship of this patch, only noting it's based on
Mizuguchi-san's work. In principle, when you change the original patch, yo
On 01/24/2016 06:52 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
This patch supports the following interrupts.
- One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
Looking at the code again, ravb_multi_interrupot() only handles error and
gPTP interrupt now.
- One interr
On 01/24/2016 06:52 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
This patch supports the following interrupts.
- One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
- One interrupt for emac
- Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network control rx/tx)
This patch imp
Hello.
On 01/24/2016 06:52 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
This patch supports the following interrupts.
- One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
- One interrupt for emac
- Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network control rx/tx)
This p
Hello.
On 01/27/2016 04:49 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
Kaneko-san, with the amount of the review changes, it might make sense for
you to assume the authorship of this patch, only noting it's based on
Mizuguchi-san's work. In principle, when you change the original pat
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00:34PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
>Yoshihiro-san, there was no need to hurry -- net-next is still closed and
> by posting this patch to netdev you're only making DaveM upset...
True.
> On 01/26/2016 03:23 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> >> From: Kazuya
Hello.
Yoshihiro-san, there was no need to hurry -- net-next is still closed and
by posting this patch to netdev you're only making DaveM upset...
On 01/26/2016 03:23 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
This patch supports the following interrupts.
- One interrupt for mul
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:52:55AM +0900, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
>
> This patch supports the following interrupts.
>
> - One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
> - One interrupt for emac
> - Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network c
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi
This patch supports the following interrupts.
- One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
- One interrupt for emac
- Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network control rx/tx)
This patch improve efficiency of the interrupt handler by adding
18 matches
Mail list logo
