Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 02:50:08PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:27:32PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:19:13PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:27:32PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:19:13PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:37:34AM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
> >> >Allow dissection of N
Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 04:20:21PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:27:32PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:19:13PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:27:32PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:19:13PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:37:34AM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
> >> >Allow dissection of N
Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:19:13PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:37:34AM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>> >Allow dissection of Neighbour Discovery target IP, and source and
>> >destination link-la
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:37:34AM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
> >Allow dissection of Neighbour Discovery target IP, and source and
> >destination link-layer addresses for neighbour solicitation and
> >advertisement messages.
> >
Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:37:34AM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>Allow dissection of Neighbour Discovery target IP, and source and
>destination link-layer addresses for neighbour solicitation and
>advertisement messages.
>
>Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
>---
[...]
>@@ -633,6 +702,18 @@ bool
Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 07:36:31PM CET, t...@herbertland.com wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:24:40PM CET, t...@herbertland.com wrote:
>>>On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Simon Horman
>>>wrote:
[Repost due to gmail account problem]
O
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:09:17PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 07:54:15PM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
> >From: Tom Herbert
> >Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:33:46 -0800
> >
> >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Simon Horman
> >> wrote:
> >>> I think the above paragraph gets back
Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 08:10:06PM CET, t...@herbertland.com wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:54 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Tom Herbert
>> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:33:46 -0800
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Simon Horman
>>> wrote:
I think the above paragraph gets back to Tom's
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 08:10:06PM CET, t...@herbertland.com wrote:
>>On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:54 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Tom Herbert
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:33:46 -0800
>>>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Simon Horman
Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 07:54:15PM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: Tom Herbert
>Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:33:46 -0800
>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Simon Horman
>> wrote:
>>> I think the above paragraph gets back to Tom's original question regarding
>>> making things more complex just
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:54 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tom Herbert
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:33:46 -0800
>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Simon Horman
>> wrote:
>>> I think the above paragraph gets back to Tom's original question regarding
>>> making things more complex just for OvS
From: Tom Herbert
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:33:46 -0800
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Simon Horman
> wrote:
>> I think the above paragraph gets back to Tom's original question regarding
>> making things more complex just for OvS (use-cases). Possibly ND is an edge
>> case even for OvS and on
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:38:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Tom Herbert
>> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:36:20 -0800
>>
>> > Okay, but can you give us an idea of how many more of these protocols
>> > are going to be added to flow_dissect
Responding to myself as my previous post doesn't seem to have hit netdev
for some reason.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:28:24AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:38:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Tom Herbert
> > Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:36:20 -0800
> >
> > > Okay, b
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:38:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tom Herbert
> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:36:20 -0800
>
> > Okay, but can you give us an idea of how many more of these protocols
> > are going to be added to flow_dissector. TBH I'm not very enthused
> > about making more flow_di
From: Tom Herbert
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:36:20 -0800
> Okay, but can you give us an idea of how many more of these protocols
> are going to be added to flow_dissector. TBH I'm not very enthused
> about making more flow_dissector more complex for the benefit of OVS.
Especially since the kernel
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 10:36:31AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:24:40PM CET, t...@herbertland.com wrote:
>> >>On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Simon Horman
>> >>wr
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 10:36:31AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:24:40PM CET, t...@herbertland.com wrote:
> >>On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Simon Horman
> >>wrote:
> >>> [Repost due to gmail account problem]
> >>>
> >>
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 10:36 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
>> It's going to be a problem with a whole host of application level
>> protocols especially those run over UDP. QUIC is a great example. The
>> actual protocol will probably only ever ru
On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 10:36 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> It's going to be a problem with a whole host of application level
> protocols especially those run over UDP. QUIC is a great example. The
> actual protocol will probably only ever run in userspace, but it is
> inevitable that we want to provi
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:24:40PM CET, t...@herbertland.com wrote:
>>On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Simon Horman
>>wrote:
>>> [Repost due to gmail account problem]
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:31:33AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu
Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:24:40PM CET, t...@herbertland.com wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Simon Horman
>wrote:
>> [Repost due to gmail account problem]
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:31:33AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 11:37 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> > Allo
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> [Repost due to gmail account problem]
>
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:31:33AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 11:37 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > Allow dissection of Neighbour Discovery target IP, and source and
>> > destin
[Repost due to gmail account problem]
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:31:33AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 11:37 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Allow dissection of Neighbour Discovery target IP, and source and
> > destination link-layer addresses for neighbour solicitation and
> >
On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 11:37 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> Allow dissection of Neighbour Discovery target IP, and source and
> destination link-layer addresses for neighbour solicitation and
> advertisement messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
> ---
Hi Simon
Why is this needed ?
Any code ad
Allow dissection of Neighbour Discovery target IP, and source and
destination link-layer addresses for neighbour solicitation and
advertisement messages.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
include/net/flow_dissector.h | 14
net/core/flow_dissector.c| 83
28 matches
Mail list logo
