On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:34:17 +0100
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think it should be in netdev_unregister_kobject(). But that would
> > only get rid of one of the two calls to synchronize_rcu() in the
> > unregister_netdev.
>
> Would be already an improvement.
>
> > The other s
> I think it should be in netdev_unregister_kobject(). But that would
> only get rid of one of the two calls to synchronize_rcu() in the
> unregister_netdev.
Would be already an improvement.
> The other synchronize_rcu() is for qdisc's and not sure if that one can
> be removed?
The standard w
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:35:58 +0100
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 12 January 2008 18:51:35 Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:37:59AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > And yes, the
> > > > network stack shouldn't call synchronize_rcu() quite so much, but
>
