Re: [stable] [NET] random : secure_tcp_sequence_number should not assume CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR

2007-11-14 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:41:19PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > I discovered one other incorrect use of .tv64 (coming from me, I must > confess) > > I guess this patch is needed for 2.6.24 and stable (2.6.22 & 2.6.23) > > Thank you Thanks for sending this to stable@, but David does a great job o

Re: [NET] random : secure_tcp_sequence_number should not assume CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR

2007-11-13 Thread David Miller
From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:41:19 +0100 > I discovered one other incorrect use of .tv64 (coming from me, I must > confess) > > I guess this patch is needed for 2.6.24 and stable (2.6.22 & 2.6.23) ... > [NET] random : secure_tcp_s

[NET] random : secure_tcp_sequence_number should not assume CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR

2007-11-13 Thread Eric Dumazet
I discovered one other incorrect use of .tv64 (coming from me, I must confess) I guess this patch is needed for 2.6.24 and stable (2.6.22 & 2.6.23) Thank you [NET] random : secure_tcp_sequence_number should not assume CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR All 32 bits machines but i386 dont