Re: [LARTC] ESFQ: request for user input

Patrick McHardy wrote: > Corey Hickey wrote: >> Patrick McHardy wrote: Should ESFQ be merged into SFQ or remain as a separate qdisc? >>> I've CCed netdev. I think merging parts of ESFQ (dynamic depth and >>> flow number) would make a lot of sense, but I'm intending to submit >>> an

Re: [LARTC] ESFQ: request for user input

Corey Hickey wrote: Patrick McHardy wrote: Should ESFQ be merged into SFQ or remain as a separate qdisc? I've CCed netdev. I think merging parts of ESFQ (dynamic depth and flow number) would make a lot of sense, but I'm intending to submit an alternative to the ESFQ hashing scheme for 2

Re: [LARTC] ESFQ: request for user input

Patrick McHardy wrote: > Corey Hickey wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I haven't been keeping up with sending ESFQ [ANNOUNCE] messages to this >> list, but I've still been working on the patch. If you're curious about >> recent changes, take a look at the home page, ChangeLog, and README: >> >> http://fatooh

Re: [LARTC] ESFQ: request for user input

Corey Hickey wrote: > Hello, > > I haven't been keeping up with sending ESFQ [ANNOUNCE] messages to this > list, but I've still been working on the patch. If you're curious about > recent changes, take a look at the home page, ChangeLog, and README: > > http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ > http://fatooh